December 3, 2008

MEDICAL RESIDENTS STILL OVERWORKED

According to an article in today's Chicago Tribune, medical residents[medical school graduates caring for patients under the guidance of more experienced physicians] are still working way too many hours. The article, written by Mary Engel, discusses a report released Tuesday by the Institute of Medicine, an arm of the National Academies. The report recommends that residents not be allowed to work more than 16 consecutive hours. Currently, residents are permitted to work, get this, 30 hour shifts. And they are required to work those grueling hours despite a number of recent studies that have shown that that residents who work too long without sleep are, suprise, suprise, more likely to injure themselves or patients.

There are however, those who disagree with shortening the 30 hour shifts. Mark Langdorf, MD, Medical Director of the Emergency Department at the University of California Irvine Medical Center, is one of those who disagrees. In fact, he categorized the new recommendation as "nuts". Langdorf claims that any advantage gained by shorter shifts[like doctor and patient safety]would be outweighed by the disadvantage of having to turn patients over to doctors who don't know the patient's history. I'm no doctor, but I have to disagree with Langdorf. I thought the standard of care required that when any patient is turned over to another doctor, a comprehensive oral history is given to the new doc by the departing doctor. In addition, the patient's chart is presumably available, as is the nursing staff who typically has more contact with the patient anyway. And frankly, how sharp is a resident going to be after an exhausting 30 hour shift? I'm not sure I want some recent med school graduate making critical decisions about my health on Thursday morning, when he hasn't slept since Tuesday night. Hopefully these reforms will be enacted.


845207_sala_de_parto_05.jpg

Bookmark and Share

December 1, 2008

WAUKEGAN RADIO STATION SUED AFTER CONTEST WINNER ASSAULTED

Saw an online article from the Chicago Tribune the other day, discussing an unusual lawsuit recently filed against a local radio station. The article, written by Emily S. Achenbaum, detailed how a Chicago woman[identified only as "Jane Doe"]is suing WXLC, a Waukegan radio station, and its parent company, Next Media Group, Inc. after she won a contest run by the station - and ended up being sexually assaulted. The station ran a a "Win a Date with Travis" contest. The "Travis" in question was Travis Harvey Jr. of Gurnee, Illinois[pictured below]. He was described, in connection with the contest, as "a great guy". He claimed that due to his busy schedule as a single father, he just didn't have time to date. So on January 30, 2007, WXLC sponsored a "Win a Date with Travis" contest at an area sports bar. Contestants were invited to drop by the bar and sit and chat with Harvey. The plaintiff eventually won the contest, and Harvey promised a night out at the House of Blues in downtown Chicago. On the scheduled day though, Harvey spoke with Jane Doe and advised that he was too tired to go downtown - he suggested she come over for pizza. Jane Doe showed up, had a drink of some sort, and then felt drowsy. She claimed that Harvey then sexually assaulted her. Jane Doe went to the police several days later but there was physical evidence indicating any drugs were used or that Jane Doe had been sexually assaulted. Nonetheless, Harvey was apparently arrested and recently pled guilty to the assault and was sentenced to probation. The complaint also pointed out that prior to the assault upon Jane Doe, Harvey had twice been convicted of violating orders of protection. The complaint is alleging that the radio station was negligent in failing to check Harvey's record and promoting his as a safe and desirable companion.

travis%20harvey.jpg_20081118_12_31_28_25_h%3D116%26w%3D165


Bookmark and Share