June 20, 2008

SEX ABUSE CRISIS RAGES IN VERMONT

The story that just won't go away.


600455_priest_5.jpg

Various news agencies carried stories on Friday about the Catholic priest sex abuse scandal that is currently rocking Vermont. In May, a jury heard allegations from a former Vermont altar boy that he was abused repeatedly by Rev. Edward Paquette in the 1970s. The jury awarded the plaintiff, now in his 40's, $8.7 million dollars. The defendant, Fr. Paquette, had admitted in a 2006 deposition that he had been "sexually involved" with young boys at parishese in Indiana and Massachusetts before he applying for a position with the Burlington, Vermont Diocese in 1972. At the time, Fr. Paquette indicated he wanted to be closer to his parents, who lived in Massachusetts.

When Paquette applied for the Vermont position, Bishop Loe Pursley of the Fort Waye, Indiana Diocese advised Vermont Bishop John Marshall that Paquette had been accused of molesting young boys. Pursley further suggested that if the Vermont Diocese decided to take Paquette, he should be assigned to an institutional chaplaincy or a senior center, so he wouldn't be around children. [Documents reflecting Pursley's concerns were admitted as evidence in the trial] The Vermont Diocese however, elected to ignore that warning and assigned him to three parishes in Vermont. Paquette was subsequently accused of abusing children at each of those three parishes.

According to the victim in the recent trial, Paquette liked giving "pony rides" to the altar boys after mass. He would grope his young victims during the rides. The victim testified he was abused some 40-100 times. The victim had kept quiet for years, but decided to come forward after learning of Paquette's history and the warnings from the Indiana Diocese.

Church officials have defended their handling of abuse claims in the 1970s by claiming that at the time, it was believed that prayer and counseling would cure priests of their attraction to little boys. It is not made clear who exactly thought that prayer would cure these perverts.

In another pathetic development, the Vermont Diocese is claiming that the verdict is covered by insurance...but they just can't find the policy. No doubt they could find all kind of ancient documents damning divorce for example, but they misplaced the policy covering them for abusing children.

In yet another pathetic development, it was revealed that the Diocese had put each individual parish under charitable trusts two years ago, to shield them from what Bishop Salvatore Matano called "unbridled, unjust and terribly unreasonable assault." So the Church has elected to blame not the twisted individuals who preyed upon children, but the persons who are now seeking recovery for years of abuse.

At least three additional lawsuits are scheduled to begin in August.

October 31, 2007

MORE DETAILS ON CHICAGO PRIEST ACCUSED OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT

More details are emerging about precisely how early Church authorities were aware of alleged sexual misconduct on the part of Rev. Donald J. McGuire. McGuire was a teacher at Loyola Academy in the late 1960's. In 1969, Rev. Charles Schlax contacted the the president of Loyola, Rev. John Reinke, to complain about McGuire. A young man had complained to Fr. Schlax that McGuire was a "pervert". The youth had apparently been staying at Loyola for as much as a week at a time, including nights. Schlax had requested an investigation into McGuire. Shortly thereafter McGuire was informed he was going to take a sabbatical.

Then in 2000, several families who had sons working as aides to McGuire expressed more concern about McGuire's behavior. One family reported that their son told them McGuire was overwhelming him with pornography and sexual discussions. Another family complained that McGuire was pressuring their son to avoid college, family and friends - and instead spend more time with McGuire. McGuire apparently encouraged the kid to sleep on the floor in his room, or in his bed.

Shockingly, McGuire's superiors have indicated as recently as 2005 that they had no knowledge of McGuire's proclivities. Turns out they had plenty of notice and allowed this guy to terrorize kids for 40 years.

October 26, 2007

ANOTHER SEXUAL ABUSE LAWSUIT AGAINST CHICAGO PRIEST

Just this week, another sexual abuse lawsuit was filed against Rev. Donald McGuire, a Chicago area priest. The lawsuit, filed by two brothers, claims that McGuire sexually abused the two boys at different times. The older brother is claiming abuse from 1988 through 1994, while the younger brother is claiming abuse from 2001 through 2002.
In 2006, McGuire was convicted of molesting two boys in the 1960's. He is currently living in Oak Lawn, a southwest Chicago suburb, while that conviction is being appealed. He was only recently advised by his superiors that he can no longer wear his collar.

AND WHO PAYS THE PRICE??

In an ironic twist, just this week I saw another article about the efforts taken by the Los Angeles Diocese to fund the $660 million dollar settlement it reached with hundreds of sexual abuse victims. The diocese has decided to sell some 50 non-parish properties. One of those properties is the convent used by the Sisters of St. Bethany, located in Santa Barbara. The convent, which was built for the order in 1952 is currently occupied by three older nuns who work with the poor in the community. Although they do not pay rent, they do make sufficient funds to sustain the property. Recently, the Diocese advised them[in a letter]that they were to vacate the premises on or before 12/31/07. The Diocese defended its action by noting that everybody was having to sacrifice. By way of example, it was noted that Diocese employees didn't get a raise in 2007. Okay, but that doesn't quite equate with losing your home of 50 years. And not to put too fine a point on it, but the nuns didn't abuse any minors. Instead, that was done by 245 Diocese priests. And the unrebutted evidence indicates that for decades the Diocese didn't act on parent complaints, didn't call police and didn't warn parishioners when allegations were made against a particular priest. In fact, up until 2004, parishioners were not advised of allegations against a Diocese priest even if that priest was "sent away" for psychological counselling. How many of those 50 non-parish properties that house priests are being sold??